• Category
    • Career & Work
    • Entertainment
    • Food & Drink
    • Health & Wellness
    • Life
    • Games
    • Technology
    • Travel
    • Trends
    • Society & Culture
    • Beauty & Style
    • Pets
    • Education
    • Relationship
    • Science
    • Bizarre Stuff
    • Quotes
  • About Us
  • Explore
    • Random Articles
    • Recently Published
    • Enkilove Ranking
Log In
or
Google+ Facebook
Create an account
Forgot password?
Discussions
Society & Culture
271K+
1
There're many people question the authenticity of the moon landing since July 21, 1969 Apollo 12 landed on the moon. Want to why was the moon landing a hoax? Here're 8 persuasive proofs.
View Article

WilkinsonBec

Age:30  Freelance Writer

On Enki-Village over 10 years

Currently fulfilling a life long dream of working as a freelance writer. I love travel, good food, new experiences an...
Author Profile
ANY IDEAS ABOUT THIS TOPIC?
Write Your Comment

Please Log In or add your name and email to post the comment.

NAME:
EMAIL:
  • ShowmmoOct.1 17:37
    What the hell is this. If the the moon landing is hoax than people other countries wold not not to go far to march other than landing on moon. I just want the conspirators a bit of information that on that time the technology of moving making was not so modern and there was no animation.(as far a I know). just in case the US done this on purpose than they would surely know that there is no air in moon. then why would they give the first photo holding a flag in moon. for proof we can take a powerful telescope and see the footprint of Neil Armstrong. Conspirators work is to make conspirachy. we should not always believe them.
    Reply
  • George Vreeland HillOct.2 05:45
    A hoax of the magnitude would involve way too many people. Just like the JFK "hoax", 9/11 "hoax" and others, someone would have talked by now. 9/11 happened because of terrorists and the moon landing happened as shown. Yes, we did have the technology to land on the moon. We had the means to build nuclear missiles as well, even in 1945. Nothing was a hoax. The only hoax is the people who yell hoax every time something happens. It's getting very laughable. George Vreeland Hill
    Reply
  • Kelly_41mOct.4 21:22
    Interesting conspiracy theory's here, however China's moon orbiter and rover have confirmed the USA did in-fact leave stuff behind on the moon. So much for the moon landing hoax theory.
    Reply
  • Trey DDawgOct.5 16:39
    Me and Gary were cuddling while discussing this last night.
    Reply
  • JimboOct.6 00:52
    Forget the flag blowing and shadows. Look at NASA's very own photos of the lunar lander in its final resting spot. There are no tracks in front of or behind it. In addition, the chatter on the radio is more like a telephone than a radio wave traveling thousands of miles. See on TV at night when someone on the other side of the planet has a delay in communication? The delay would have been much, much greater with earth talking to people on the moon, but the conversation is instantaneous. Also, the backgrounds are exactly the same for different apollo missions, despite NASA telling us they were miles and miles apart from each other. Lastly, put a color photograph in a plastic wallet sleeve in your oven at 250 degrees. Let it bake about 20 minutes and see if it doesn't curl up. Well, astronaut Charles Duke took a photo of a photo he allegedly left on the moons surface. In the sun, that temp is over 250 degrees. http://petapixel.com/2013/02/11/the-family-photo-that-made-it-to-the-moon/ This was a series of short movies directed by Stanley Kubrick. He even gives us many clues in his later movie The Shining.
    Reply
  • Bob KermanAug.4 16:20
    @ : -The lunar lander actually had no wheels - how could it leave tracks? -It's actually not instantaneous - the delay is approximately three seconds, which is exactly what one would expect from direct radio communication from Earth to Moon. -"same?" Please give me links to the preferably non-edited pictures. NASA spent billions of dollars on the Apollo program. Surely they could save 20 of those for new paint? -The temperature may be about 250 degrees, but the convection is too low for the photo to be damaged. After about 48 hours it would start to degrade, however. -Proof? What clues? I can say that the Martian gives clues, but I don't give any proof. A rational person like myself needs proof if I want to consider the claim true.
    Reply
  • Shelley Oct.10 21:42
    Why isn't the Earth in the background much larger? It wouldn't be the same size as the moon is viewed from Earth. Obviously faked.
    Reply
  • SeanOct.11 05:25
    If Apollo 11 were a hoax, why did they repeat the hoax five more times? Plus, all you need to do is research the Lunar Laser Ranging experiment.
    Reply
  • JayOct.11 05:26
    Damn right the earth is flat. It's the people that get all their info from the national news channels that are duped. Everybody believes everything that is published or broadcast on the news. There was no moon landing. Most intelligent objective thinkers know this fact along with the other so called conspiracies. Who said we landed on the moon? CBS news? NASA? Lol... Come on, people just accept and believe everything they hear on TV or were taught in a text book. Where's the proof? The earth is flat. NASA posts one picture of the globe and a fake moon landing you think that's proof? George Bush says it was 18 terrorists that high jacked an air liner with box cutters? Lol...
    Reply
  • HectorJan.28 15:32
    @ : We knew that the Earth is round THOUSANDS OF YEARS BEFORE TV AND TEXTBOOKS AND PHOTOS! If the Earth was flat, then there wouldn't be a horizon; you could see as far as you wanted to, provided that there's nothing in the way. You would also always be able to see the sun, regardless whether it's a spotlight or not, because you could still see the light from it casting on other parts of the disc, even if it wasn't shining on you. The Earth would have to spin at a ridiculous rate in order to combat gravity compressing it back into a sphere, to a point where it would definitely be noticeable.
    Reply
  • TonyOct.17 09:41
    You lot really need to get out more.
    Reply
  • MikaylaOct.25 23:58
    I think it was a hoax, the evidence is all there!
    Reply
  • NASA Sep.10 07:35
    @ : No it is not, what sort of evidence are you talking about?
    Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Home
Terms Of Use
About EnkiVillage
How To Write
All texts are contributed by our excellent writers. Powered by enkivillage.org.
Server responsed at: 06/17/2025 8:21 p.m.