There're many people question the authenticity of the moon landing since July 21, 1969 Apollo 12 landed on the moon. Want to why was the moon landing a hoax? Here're 8 persuasive proofs.
ANY IDEAS ABOUT THIS TOPIC?
Write Your Comment
-
I realize that this list is mostly in jest, but I stumbled across this other article that has me really starting to wonder... (http://itaglive.com/science/findings-show-that-original-moon-landing-is-implausible/)
-
These can all be explained the flag: the metal poles extending it were accidentally bent Don't try to say you that "tinfoil isn't enough to protect from radiation Lastly the c and everything else can be explained by one thing if nasa really spent millions of dollars on faking the moon landing they probably had a ton of people checking the pictures for things that could have given it away so they wouldn't have left stuff like that in
-
In the 1960s, faking a moon landing would be FAR more difficult than actually just going to the moon. The video/film technology of the day was not up to the task. Anyone pointing to 2001: A Space Odyssey should know that movie is littered with errors that wouldn't stand up under the greatest of scientific scrutiny. Two obvious ones: 1) When Heywood Floyd "drinks" his food from a "food drink box" while on the moon shuttle, the "food liquid level" in the straw falls back down the straw when he stops sucking on it. that wouldn't happen in zero gravity. 2) The people in Clavius Moon base, and the astronauts on the moon, walk as if the moon has normal earth gravity. Video/film technology hadn't advanced all that much, but rocket/propulsion technology was light-years ahead because of the nuclear arms race. Ironically, today, it is far easier to fake a moon landing than it is to go there! Even with our advanced technology, it is still quite difficult and costly to get to the moon. But video technology has grown by leaps and bounds since the 60s.
-
The Earth is not flat at all, it only looks that way because you're standing on its surface. But if you were to go out into space and look back at the earth, you would see that it is actually round. Also the reason that you can see the astronauts and the lunar module so clearly is because there are multiple light sources. But those sources aren't Hollywood lights, those sources are: the sun, the lunar surface reflecting the sunlight, and the earth's light relfection.
-
I have a thing to say against all reasons: 1. The flag has to be stored as tightly as it can. It did not blow in a breeze, and the flag might have been affected by Solar wind. 2. The shadows don't match up because they took images from different angles and the astronauts probably used lights to show more of the lunar surface. 3. The only reason you don't see stars on the moon is because on earth, the sun's light is darkened by the atmosphere, allowing you to see stars. On the moon, there is no atmosphere, so you are completely vulnerable to the sun which would be 5 times brighter than on earth, blocking out the very dim light of other stars. 4. It is very much possible for two rock formations to LOOK the same. Some of these apparent "rock formations" could have been multiple formations in front of each other, creating the ILLUSION of similar rock formations. 5. you really don't know Murphy's Law or The Law of Infinite Probability, don't you? Murphy's Law states that "anything that can happen, will happen", and The Law of Infinite Probability States "Anything has a possibility of happening". Based off these, This "C" Could have been weathered into the rock, or maybe carved. 6. Aluminum can be protective from radiation, as radiation acts like a gas in space. Gasses can't pass through solids (balloons slowly lose air through micro holes), so the astronauts are safe. 7. The so called "Hanging Object"? You guys are idiots, It's the shadow of the astronaut standing there up close and personal to show you his awesome helmet! 8. Things are lighter in space. Planets have more packed places than others. The astronauts had to act a force to keep from going too high, and the lander has to go slowly to keep from tipping and angling off course. Yes, It can be dangerous to land a lunar module on a moon When it's going about 2/ms. Are you convinced that you come up with stupid reasons? Then take down this article and go place the label HOAX on something else.
-
Well this is a link to a video where Stanley K says he faked the moon landings. On Camera http://yournewswire.com/stanley-kubrick-confesses-to-faking-the-moon-landings/
-
Missing here is the set of images in which the background of which a picture is being taken actually blocks out crosshairs that are in the camera.
-
Could there be a clue to NASA control and falsification of the moon landing hidden in plain view ?. I say that the quarantine facility that the astronauts had to spend 3 weeks in on their return was . There were no bugs on the moon and the scientists knew this without doubt in 1969. They new that the moon had a hard vacuum right down to the surface and that there was no or very little water, certainly no liquid water and the surface was irradiated with solar UV and high speed solar wind and cosmic radiation continuously , how could life develop in such circumstances , it couldn't and they new it. ! No ! the quarantine facility was to separate the astronauts from the press etc on return , let every thing settle down a little , give the astronauts a bit more training in their deception , reasons for it , probably to remind them of the consequences of blowing the whistle , making sure 100% they were ready for the lie to go live in the real world. The quarantine facility was used on 11,12, and 14 so they took 3 trips to figure out the obvious ? Surely it would be completely obvious on the first trip . It was not used on 15,16,and 17 supposedly because they "found" out there is no bugs on the moon . If it was used for as I say a kind of de-briefing period isolation then why were 15,16 and 17 not required . is there something different about those flights .
-
It takes milions of dollars and thousand highly profesional personel on earth and contious monitoring of equipment to go there. To get back????. Mh postbox are more advance than that four leg thing. Where do they sit and where are the feul????. You nead a few ton of feul for the first few seconds. And you gone go down for quite a wile in that powder surface if you dare to fire up that tipe of thrust.
-
Strange how technology developed in the las few yeas. How often they send some thing up to space. And still do no efford of a quik visit on the old moon. It sould by nou be like go to mc donalds for a hammy???
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15