There're many people question the authenticity of the moon landing since July 21, 1969 Apollo 12 landed on the moon. Want to why was the moon landing a hoax? Here're 8 persuasive proofs.
ANY IDEAS ABOUT THIS TOPIC?
Write Your Comment
-
During all Apollo moon flights, the spacecraft(s) CM and LM, were tracked by radar and telemetry signals from hundreds of locations around the world including England's own Joddrell Bank Observatory. One reason for this, but not the main reason, was to provide proof that the spacecraft was launched from earth to the moon with men inside and that they returned to the earth, splashing down in the Pacific Ocean, with the same three men inside., plus moon rocks. They went to where it was planned they would go and they came back with what they had planned to bring back, (with the exception of Apollo 13). Everything moon landing/walking deniers bring up, is easily explained. For those of you who believe this never happened, you have got to quit looking at "familiar" subjects as we see them on earth, and take it from the perspective of how they look on the moon, which has no atmosphere. Finally, in response to some who argue that the Soviet Union was "way ahead" of the United States. Yes, in the early days they were, but by the end of 1966, we had caught up and surpassed them with the Gemini program. They still did not know how to master the concept of rendezvous and docking, essential to sending a man to the moon and back. Meanwhile the Russians did have a more powerful rocket than our Saturn V, but it kept blowing up either on the launch pad or shortly after liftoff. That is why they did not make it to the moon. Don't doubt me on this stuff, sir, I was with the U,S. space program and I know very well what I'm talking about.
-
The reason that in the pictures listed there are no stars seen is because of light pollution. Whether it be from the flash of a camera, the sun (because it might be day time), or lights that the astronauts have set up on the surface to properly see. Have you ever been walking down the street in the city at night and look up? Its hard to see stars right? Likewise, if you were to look up at the sky at night while camping in the woods a vast amount of stars are visible right? Plus if it were a hoax, wouldn't the background of the movie set have stars? I mean they'd have to make it realistic right?
-
Does anyone find it odd that the capsule they returned in always fell about half a mile from the ship in the Pacific ocean. Yet when a satellite falls from space they have no idea where it may land! Fake! Fake! Fake! Fake!
-
Why when I cross state lines I lose cell service but in 1969 we have the ability to talk to men on the moon? I'm not buying it! Fake!
-
Hey I know that the moon landing happened but if it did I just am wondering how they video taped Neil Armstrong as he walked onto the moon before any other man. How would someone have video taped him if there was no one there? Im just wondering I don't support the hoax landing theory but i'm just curious.
-
I question the astronauts interviews. There are a few out there where they get VERY defensive when questioned about the landing. Buzz even punched a guy in the face. Another was tricked by an interviewer and then told him to get the hell out of my house if you dont belive me then I dont care I am going to sue you. These were the "all the right stuff guys" If I actually went to the moon and walked on the moon and I was "all the right stuff" you could have the brightest and best interviewer come talk with me and I would make you feel stupid. Why? Because I was there, I did it and all my answers are true. I would WOW you with the incredible experience and I certainly wouldn't need to punch you for doubting me!!! That is what reached out and grabbed me. The truth is always very easy to belive and never really needs to be defended like that.
-
Ok, Just got on a topic about a old old old conspiracy theory that in fact that moon landing was fake. I want to throw a idea out there. Starting with a Flag a American Flag in a small space with in H20,C02, ect.. you get the point. I have spent just a few min looking up this retarded conspiracy looking only for public, recognition. So my point being . THE BIG WORD MOISTURE+HEAT = MOVEMENT. Yes shadows could play a small part yet unlikely the effect we've all seen. As we all know space is cold and even hotter in the sun. Any moisture over that long trip being fabric or absorbent to moisture. I hope for sake of article, this would at least spark or put this damn, theory to rest. SPC J US ARMY.
-
Some points are good, other are dumb... For example, if it was filmed in a Studio, why would there be wind in there? (regarding the flag)... and wouldn't the wind affect the dust to? And the lack of stars on the sky, it is so easy to explain if you had ever used a video camera and use a little of logic: the light of the Sun is very powerfull, and its reflection on the Moon surface and any object in general is quite strong (just look at the Moon on the sky and you will understand how strong it is), therefore the camera must have a very low saturation, which the stars, which don't produce light strong enought to compete with the Sun, invisible... this is the reason why there almost no stars at all even in pictures and filmings from the ISS, unless, the Station is placed on the dark side of the planet where Sun light doesn't reach (in ISS case the dust particles in space play a role too).
-
History is written by those who control the mass media and propaganda, it was alot easier to fool ppl in the 60's, didn't do it then they cant do it now,funny why nasa were mostly nazi war criminals, the pros of propaganda, to milk the American ppl of billions of dollers while they were killing ppl in veitnam and more than half the world lives in poverty, pretty fucking sad part of history if you ask me!
-
1. The American Flag Flutters Gently in the Non Existent Breeze That's not fluttering there in a still photograph. It's holding a crumpled shape. The flag only swings (not flutters or blows) like a pendulum when the astronauts are messing around with the pole. 2. Is There More Than One Sun? Because Those Shadows Don’t Match Up! They do match up, whatever that means. Shadows cast by the sun are parallel, but rarely APPEAR parallel in photos taken from the side. View all those scenes from above, and the shadows would appear parallel as well. This is due to perspective, and the uneven terrain. Google Images for "parallel shadows" to see many examples of parallel shadows cast on Earth by the sun and vertical posts or trees, and you can see the effects of perspective and terrain on the apparent directions of these shadows. 3. You’re in Space… Then Where Are the Stars? The surface is brightly-lit by the sun. The cameras are set for daylight because they are photographing the bright surface and the bright white astronauts. The film exposure time is too short. Dim lights like stars rarely show up under these conditions. To take photographs of stars, the camera has to be set for long film exposure, and aimed away from anything bright. The Apollo astronauts did do this with their UV camera during Apollo 16. The stars are oriented the exact same way when viewed from Earth or the moon, anyway. 4. Oh Look! It’s the Same Rocks & Mountains…Again…And Again Well, they are photographing the same rocks and mountains over and over again. They are in the background. The claim was that the same missions used "identical backdrops", not that separate missions did. If you take a photograph here of a place with a mountain behind it, move a couple of kilometers away, then take a photograph of another place with the same mountain behind it, IT'S THE SAME MOUNTAIN. Anyone can do this. It's not magic, or fakery. 5. Carved by Nature… Why Does That Rock Have a "C" Drawn on It? No, it's a stray hair. It's not in the original photo, only in a certain published copy. Also, it is irregular in shape, with a strange bend in the middle, and a bulb at the top end. It casts a shadow slightly downward onto the photograph during the copying process; a shadow much different in direction and intensity than what was cast by the sun all over the rest of the photograph. It doesn't look like a proper C at all, it's not thick and black like a printed "C" card would be, it doesn't have a rectangular white card behind it, and NO ONE LABELS MOVIE PROPS IN THIS WAY! 6. Fly Through a Belt of Radiation and You Should've Get Cooked No, you shouldn't have "get cooked". That radiation is greatly exaggerated, the astronauts took a plotted course over the belts (they're just belts, they don't completely surround the Earth), and they had radiation shielding in the spacecraft.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15